News


“CV STEALTH” – Stakeholder Proceedings and Rule B attachments

January 2018

Could Head Owners "intercept" funds due to Disponent Owners from Sub-Charterers on the basis of a pending appeal against the vacation of a Rule B attachment?

more >>

“CV STEALTH” (No.2) – Cause of vessel’s detention

November 2017

Were Sub-Charterers' orders still an effective cause of the vessel's detention? Can a credit against damages be given before any saving has been made?

more >>

“CV STEALTH” – Off-hire and Breach

April 2016

Following the detention of the vessel in Venezuela, Disponent Owners claim an indemnity for losses from Sub-Charterers

more >>

High Court decision regarding compliance with the terms of an on demand Bank Guarantee

December 2016

The dispute concerned the issue of whether two demands (the “Demands”) sent shortly before the Guarantee expired, triggered the Bank’s obligation to make payment under the Guarantee.

more >>

SEA MIROR

August 2014

“Discharged at the expenses and risk of Receivers/Charterers” – who is liable for stevedore damage to cargo on outturn?

Societe de Distribution de Toutes Merchandises en Cote D’Ivoire trading as “SDTM-CI” v Continental Lines N.V. and another (the SEA MIROR) [2015] EWHC 1747

more >>

MTM HONG KONG

A new way of looking at damages for repudiation of a voyage charter.

Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA v MT Maritime Management BV [2015] EWHC 2505 (Comm)

more >>

Lax & Co successfully overturn US$150m judgment in Court of Appeal

August 2014

Novoship UK Limited (& 14 Others) v Vladimir Mikhaylyuk (& 7 Others) [2012] EWHC 3586

Mike Lax and Robert Pollock-Hill acted for a Russian businessman, Mr Nikitin (the 6th Defendant) and two companies controlled by him (the 7th and 8th Defendants) in a dispute heard in the Commercial Court between the London agent of the Russian shipping company, JSC Novoship (now part of Sovcomflot) and various one ship companies.

more >>

Gulf of Aden transit and repudiation

Effect of Amended BIMCO Piracy Clause. Whether consent of Owner needed to transit piracy areas. Whether Owner in repudiatory breach by insisting that consent needed to be sought and provided for each transit.

June 2014

The Bulk Uruguay [2014] EWHC 885

The case concerned the issue of whether Disponent Owners were in anticipatory breach of a three year charter so as to entitle the Charterers to treat themselves as discharged from further performance.

more >>

Lax & Co welcomes Supreme Court victory over Sovcomflot

December 2013

Mike Lax, senior partner of London shipping law firm Lax & Co LLP, has welcomed the decision of the English Supreme Court to refuse Russian state-owned shipping monolith Sovcomflot permission to appeal in the Fiona Trust case, thus bringing to an end litigation which has been rumbling on for eight years.

more >>

Appeal Court allows shipowner’s claim for freight entitlement

March 2013

Court of Appeal (Civil Division), 14 March 2013, BP Oil International Limited v Target Shipping Limited

The Court of Appeal in London has upheld the entitlement of a shipowner to full freight in respect of an entire oil cargo transported under a charter party which provided for a minimum quantity and included an 'overage' discount.

more >>

Copyright Lax & Co. LLP 2018